iarb

General Egyptian Petroleum Corporation (EGPC, Appellant) and National Gas Company (NATGAS, Respondent) concluded a contract from adduction of natural gas for to supply residential & industrial area, as well as the power plants located in Al-Sharqiyah. NATGAS having subscribed, for the financing of the operation, the loans made out in US dollars and euros, the parity modification of the Egyptian pound, decided by the Egyptian authorities by a decree, has given weight to the financial expenses. The refusal of EGPC to support this extras expense led NATGAS to present a request for arbitration which made an award in its favor.

On June 5th, 2008, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC, defendant) concluded with Customs & Tax Consultancy LLC (CTC, applicant), a contract on there reorganization of the Office of the Customs and Excise duties (OFIDA) to improve the effectiveness of coverage by the Congolese State of its customs receipts. A dispute arose. In Paris, on July 22nd, 2015, the arbitration court delivered an award in favor of CTC. The DRC requires the court to cancel it, as well as the addendum, to cancel CTC’s application and to condemn it to pay the sum 100,000€. It pleads the violation of the international public order resulting from the absence of competition before the signature of the contract.

Vodacom International Ltd (VIL, defendant) entered into a joint venture, Vodacom Congo SA (VDRC, defendant), Vodacom Congo SA with a local phone operator, to be established in the Democratic republic of Congo (DRC). VIL concluded two contracts of consultancy with Namemco Energy ltd (Applicant), having a south African single shareholder, Mr. Y Z (applicant). Dispute arose and there has been a long legal procedure.

Wireless Network SPRL (CWN, demanderesse), et Vodacom International Ltd (VIL, défenderesse) ont conclu le 24 octobre 2001 un contrat de co-entreprise afin de mener conjointement des opérations de téléphonie mobile en République Démocratique du Congo (RDC) et ont créé à cette fin, par acte constitutif la société Vodacom Congo Sprl RDC. Un différend était survenu entre les actionnaires. Par une sentence rendue à Bruxelles le 6 septembre 2013, le tribunal arbitral a condamné CWN à verser à VIL la somme cumulée de USD 204.207.775,28 et à rembourser à VIL 80% de ses frais de défense. Le Tribunal arbitral a rendu un addendum à la sentence (l’addendum).

FG Hemisphere (Defendant) approached the advisor in order to render inadmissible the appeal of the Société nationale d’électricité (SNEL, defendant). The SNEL contested the advisor ability to make an award on the admissibility of the appeal. The advisor of the setting in.

Congo and the Société Nationale d’électricité (SNEL, plaintiff), appealed against the order made by the president of the Tribunal de grande instance of Paris giving enforcing the arbitral award rendered in Zurich under the aegis of the international court of arbitration of the international Chamber of commerce by the Arbitral Tribunal in the dispute against FG Hemisphere Associates LLC (defendant). Pre-trial Advisor said the appeal of SNEL obsolete but rejected the request of FG Hemisphere to declare null and void the appeal of the DRC. SNEL has brought the order for enforcement of an award made abroad.

The Republic of Congo (applicant) and Commission Import-Export (Commisinpex, of the respondents) have concluded several public work contract and supply of materials. The Tribunal said that the needs of the international public order are opposed to the effect that will be created, in the arbitral proceeding, by the liquidation of Commisinpex. Has also realized the defects of the liquidators. It has rejected the claim of reimbursement of the costs for liquidation in the arbitration and it has declared itself incompetent to see the other claims of Commisinpex. It has condemned Congo to pay Commisinpex 222.749.598 euros. Congo has appealed against this decision.

By affermage contract , Cameroon has entrusted to Projet Pilote Garoube (respondent) the exploitation of a protected area to create a ranch for the improvement of the wildlife, for the production if meat and for the ecotourism. The contract has been interrupted; Garoube stopped the exploitation and transferred its seat to Belgium, then filed for arbitration to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC, appellant). By an error of payment of the additional provision due on the 24th of June 2014, the ICC informed Garoube and Cameroon that their application is considered as withdrawn and that the tribunal has been required to cease its activities. Garoube has summoned the CCI to the tribunal de grande instance of Paris as a ‘’juge d’appui’’ and he has passed an order. The association of the International Chamber of Commerce has appeal against this decision.

Groupe Tomota SA signed with Mali a MOU setting out terms & conditions of the shares. Dispute arose. Tomota has submitted a request for Arbitration to the CCJA which has rendered an award which says that Mali was in violation of the contract. The award was made enforceable in France. Mali has appealed against this decision. Meanwhile Mali has made recourse against the arbitral award before the CCJA.

Bec frères SA & la Société Grands Travaux d’Afrique (respondents) by a contract, a grouping of companies to execute jointly & severally works which BEC was the agent. Dispute arose. The Tribunal made an award in favor of the grouping. The Ministry of Equipment was condemned to pay some amount of money to the grouping.